<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So a Big Four is set to fail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/12/so-a-big-four-is-set-to-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/12/so-a-big-four-is-set-to-fail/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connecting the campaigning micro dots</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/12/so-a-big-four-is-set-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7441</link>
		<dc:creator>Connecting the campaigning micro dots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=6067#comment-7441</guid>
		<description>[...] And Game Review Sites (inquisitr.com)Speaking like a human isn&#8217;t quite enough (hyperorg.com)So a Big Four is set to fail? (accmanpro.com)GD Star Ratingloading...GD Star Ratingloading...blog comments powered by Disqus var [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And Game Review Sites (inquisitr.com)Speaking like a human isn&#8217;t quite enough (hyperorg.com)So a Big Four is set to fail? (accmanpro.com)GD Star Ratingloading&#8230;GD Star Ratingloading&#8230;blog comments powered by Disqus var [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Continuing The Conversation: If Auditors Weren&#8217;t There, Why Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/12/so-a-big-four-is-set-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7440</link>
		<dc:creator>re: The Auditors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Continuing The Conversation: If Auditors Weren&#8217;t There, Why Not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=6067#comment-7440</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/12/so-a-big-four-is-set-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7442</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=6067#comment-7442</guid>
		<description>As a UK Chartered Accountant and occasional auditor, with no first hand experience of the Big 4, I keep thinking it must be so simple: if the auditors of &quot;big&quot; or &quot;listed&quot; companies were forbidden to do ANY other work for those clients, surely:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; 1) The temptation to skimp on the auditing wuld be removed,&lt;br&gt; 2) The total of audit and non-audit fees available to be earned by the profession would not be reduced, because the work would still need to be done (whisper it softly, the overall fees might even increase), and&lt;br&gt; 3) Maybe just maybe, the Satyams and Parmalats of this world would be reduced, to the benefit of everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The regulators could make this happen tomorrow, or at least next year. Why is there not the will? It&#039;s not as if the firms would lose out overall. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The status quo seems a bit Alice in Wonderland at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a UK Chartered Accountant and occasional auditor, with no first hand experience of the Big 4, I keep thinking it must be so simple: if the auditors of &#8220;big&#8221; or &#8220;listed&#8221; companies were forbidden to do ANY other work for those clients, surely:</p>
<p> 1) The temptation to skimp on the auditing wuld be removed,<br /> 2) The total of audit and non-audit fees available to be earned by the profession would not be reduced, because the work would still need to be done (whisper it softly, the overall fees might even increase), and<br /> 3) Maybe just maybe, the Satyams and Parmalats of this world would be reduced, to the benefit of everyone.</p>
<p>The regulators could make this happen tomorrow, or at least next year. Why is there not the will? It&#39;s not as if the firms would lose out overall. </p>
<p>The status quo seems a bit Alice in Wonderland at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/12/so-a-big-four-is-set-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7439</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=6067#comment-7439</guid>
		<description>As a UK Chartered Accountant and occasional auditor, with no first hand experience of the Big 4, I keep thinking it must be so simple: if the auditors of &quot;big&quot; or &quot;listed&quot; companies were forbidden to do ANY other work for those clients, surely: 1) The temptation to skimp on the auditing wuld be removed, 2) The total of audit and non-audit fees available to be earned by the profession would not be reduced, because the work would still need to be done (whisper it softly, the overall fees might even increase), and 3) Maybe just maybe, the Satyams and Parmalats of this world would be reduced, to the benefit of everyone.The regulators could make this happen tomorrow, or at least next year. Why is there not the will? It&#039;s not as if the firms would lose out overall. The status quo seems a bit Alice in Wonderland at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a UK Chartered Accountant and occasional auditor, with no first hand experience of the Big 4, I keep thinking it must be so simple: if the auditors of &quot;big&quot; or &quot;listed&quot; companies were forbidden to do ANY other work for those clients, surely: 1) The temptation to skimp on the auditing wuld be removed, 2) The total of audit and non-audit fees available to be earned by the profession would not be reduced, because the work would still need to be done (whisper it softly, the overall fees might even increase), and 3) Maybe just maybe, the Satyams and Parmalats of this world would be reduced, to the benefit of everyone.The regulators could make this happen tomorrow, or at least next year. Why is there not the will? It&#039;s not as if the firms would lose out overall. The status quo seems a bit Alice in Wonderland at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/12/so-a-big-four-is-set-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-9589</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=6067#comment-9589</guid>
		<description>As a UK Chartered Accountant and occasional auditor, with no first hand experience of the Big 4, I keep thinking it must be so simple: if the auditors of &quot;big&quot; or &quot;listed&quot; companies were forbidden to do ANY other work for those clients, surely:

 1) The temptation to skimp on the auditing wuld be removed,
 2) The total of audit and non-audit fees available to be earned by the profession would not be reduced, because the work would still need to be done (whisper it softly, the overall fees might even increase), and
 3) Maybe just maybe, the Satyams and Parmalats of this world would be reduced, to the benefit of everyone.

The regulators could make this happen tomorrow, or at least next year. Why is there not the will? It&#039;s not as if the firms would lose out overall. 

The status quo seems a bit Alice in Wonderland at times.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a UK Chartered Accountant and occasional auditor, with no first hand experience of the Big 4, I keep thinking it must be so simple: if the auditors of &#8220;big&#8221; or &#8220;listed&#8221; companies were forbidden to do ANY other work for those clients, surely:</p>
<p> 1) The temptation to skimp on the auditing wuld be removed,<br />
 2) The total of audit and non-audit fees available to be earned by the profession would not be reduced, because the work would still need to be done (whisper it softly, the overall fees might even increase), and<br />
 3) Maybe just maybe, the Satyams and Parmalats of this world would be reduced, to the benefit of everyone.</p>
<p>The regulators could make this happen tomorrow, or at least next year. Why is there not the will? It&#8217;s not as if the firms would lose out overall. </p>
<p>The status quo seems a bit Alice in Wonderland at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

