You are here: Home » General » Words matter

Words matter

by Dennis Howlett on December 13, 2009

For most people, the nuances of technology are at best a foreign language and at worst a turn off. Buyers don’t give a flying souflee what vendors are doing as long as they know their apps are running. So when Xero put this headline into the blogs:Â 55,000 servers and pumping I couldn’t help but wonder what the heck was going on. My initial response was to question whether that meant 4.5 servers for every Xero customer. If so then it has huge implications for cost and on to viability. That’s something that should be of concern to anyone investing in SaaS apps. It seems I missed the context. I was shocked at the response that implied I was taking the piss. But as I said in comments:

Rod. Not having a crack at all – aaah – I think I get it. Xero gets access to not necessarily using. OK. That isn’t clear.

Hmm…headline doesn’t help, neither does the opening para which says: “We’ve just added more than 55,000 new servers…” but later says: “Akamai have more than 55,000 servers around the world, in over 70 countries…”

I don’t think Xero did itself any favours trying to conflate the server environment in the way that it did even though the story’s essence was bang on the money and should be welcome as indicative of a vendor moving forward to better support its customer base. Ben Kepes thought I made a bad joke saying:

I really hope that was a joke Dennis…. A bad one admittedly but better than not understanding the post

I have news for Ben – my audience doesn’t always ‘get it’ either. What Ben misses is that I bat for buyers who are not necessarily interested in the tech that supports vendor ’stuff.’ Ergo Ben’s comment represents the triumph of techno-speak over business sense. Slam me if you want but remember I represent a proxy for buying decision makers. If you get the message wrong or present in an obfuscated manner then don’t shoot the respondent messenger who doesn’t ‘get it.’ And don’t expect me to get it right every time. At least have some respect for buyers. Otherwise you present as someone who doesn’t care about customers.

To Rod’s credit, he returned with a jocular comment that the author has ambitions to be a tabloid journalist. I guess that’s a tacit admission to having muffed the discussion. Either way, at least we have clarity. Perhaps a lesson for us all to get away from technospeak and into business value?

Disclosure: Xero has been a faithful AccMan sponsor and a company I wish all the best as one that’s trying hard to make a difference. But  as I’ve always said about any sponsor, that doesn’t give them a free pass. I still admire what they’re doing.

Disclosure 2: I am an equal opportunity flamethrower.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark
  • "What we have here is a failure to communicate"
    - one of the best movie lines ever

    It's interesting to see how one comment can balloon. I think there's a second lesson here.
  • Ben, Dennis

    My 2 cents worth.

    I agree with Dennis that technology speak does muddle the communication and as I tell my staff "we are a communication company, not an IT company". If our customers do not understand what we write then we have failed.

    Ben, stop being a Xero fan boy and understand what Dennis said and why he said. Technology alone will not do it for Xero. Xero is dead slow in NZ compared to in the US and hopefully the Akamai caching will deal to this issue which is a very real issue. If using an online accounting system increases your work day because it is slow then eventually this does not become a win-win for both parties involved.

    A better way to write the article would have been to explain how this will speed up access. Now that will really get peoples attention.

    PS. Dennis, how about increasing the vertical depth of your comments field slightly.
  • benkepes
    Dermott - you misunderstand why Dennis said what he did. He was questioning the financial viability of Xero in the event that they needed 4.5 servers per user. Nothing to do with speed at all. I wasn't being a fan boy at all, merely questioning Dennis' technical understanding....

    I've used Xero across several business for a year or so - while I'll agree that it's slower in NZ than in the US, I'd not call it "dead slow". Agreed however that Akamai should improve things for users with significant round trip distances to Rackspace's servers...
  • benkepes
    Hmmm - whatever Dennis, sorry if you were perturbed by my counter comment

    I guess those readers who don't "get" the 55000 server technical thing also have no real interest, understanding or reason to be au fait with the issues that would have been raised if it had been 4.5 servers per customer.

    So... in your "bat for customers who have no interest in tech that supports vendor side stuff" style I'd say.. - 1 server per thousand custmers or 1 server per individual customer - it doesn't really matter so long as the product meets the needs of its customers - solutions matter, the tech shenanigans behind it does not....
  • @ben: it was an ill conceived presentation that got my alarm bells ringing. Buyers don't care about these things unless it appears as a vendor validation issue. That was my initial reading though I accept there was more to be nuanced. I hope that's obvious from my observations. Your assumption I was joking didn't help. I was genuinely shocked at the responses from @rod and yourself. It got me to read again. I should not have to do that in order to understand the message.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: