<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#039;s winning in the SaaS accounting stakes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/03/01/whos-winning-in-the-saas-accounting-stakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/03/01/whos-winning-in-the-saas-accounting-stakes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coté&#039;s People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 42</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/03/01/whos-winning-in-the-saas-accounting-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-8023</link>
		<dc:creator>Coté&#039;s People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=6565#comment-8023</guid>
		<description>[...] SaaS Accounting  Taking unique visitor and total visits as your benchmark, it should be no surprise that QuickBooksOnline and FreshBooks are miles out in front of the remainder. FreshBooks recorded 830,000 uniques (inc cookies) generating 2.2 million visits. At the bottom of the scale, FinancialForce managed what seems a meagre 11,000 uniques but then it is very much in early stage growth. One surprise for me was WinWeb which only weighed in with a total of 48K uniques. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SaaS Accounting  Taking unique visitor and total visits as your benchmark, it should be no surprise that QuickBooksOnline and FreshBooks are miles out in front of the remainder. FreshBooks recorded 830,000 uniques (inc cookies) generating 2.2 million visits. At the bottom of the scale, FinancialForce managed what seems a meagre 11,000 uniques but then it is very much in early stage growth. One surprise for me was WinWeb which only weighed in with a total of 48K uniques. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud1</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/03/01/whos-winning-in-the-saas-accounting-stakes/comment-page-1/#comment-8022</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloud1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=6565#comment-8022</guid>
		<description>I dont think this is accurate at all.  For example.  Quickbooks Online web address is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quickbooksonline.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.quickbooksonline.com&lt;/a&gt; - but yet their login (where they will get a lot of unique visitors because people are signing in) qgo.intuit.com.
If you compare that to say NetSuite - the login and the page visits are to the same domain.
So to get a more accurate count (and realistic) you need to combine both domains for Quickbooks Online (probably the others too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think this is accurate at all.  For example.  Quickbooks Online web address is <a href="http://www.quickbooksonline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quickbooksonline.com</a> &#8211; but yet their login (where they will get a lot of unique visitors because people are signing in) qgo.intuit.com.<br />
If you compare that to say NetSuite &#8211; the login and the page visits are to the same domain.<br />
So to get a more accurate count (and realistic) you need to combine both domains for Quickbooks Online (probably the others too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

