Xero doubles up but challenges remain – and they’re not alone

by admin on January 30, 2012

in Cloud Computing/SaaS

As the ‘big dog’ in the SaaS/cloud accounting space, it is always interesting to hear an update from Xero. The main numbers:

  • Operating revenue for the full year ended 31 March 2012 will double 2011 (which was $9.3m).
  • Committed Monthly Revenue (CMR) is now $1.75m or $21m annualized. We’re delighted that 50% of CMR is from offshore markets showing that we becoming a truly global company.
  • Paying customers using the Xero business software worldwide exceeds 60,000. There are 240,000 user accounts.
  • There are over 3,300 accounting firms now using Xero. The accountant and bookkeepers channel model, proven in New Zealand, is showing similar early signs of success in offshore markets.
  • The company now employs 170 staff across four countries. The US sales office has been established with six staff in San Francisco.

All of which sounds fine. But then in comments I see a few grumbles. The one that stands out to me is this from Jeff Nutbeem:

Congratulations on all that income. All the more surprising that you have built this on accounting software which doesn’t produce a remittance advice when paying a supplier, nor allows for multple cheques to be entered prior to banking them. And those are just two obvious omissions which spring to mind.

Remittance advices is such an obvious requirement, yet none few of the SME systems provide this capability. But then some of the big systems don’t cover that spot either. Xero is not alone in getting their lumps. Over at FreeAgent, the ongoing grumbles about multi-currency handling has caused some ill will.

In one sense I am pleased to see these early pioneers getting a few knocks. It is a sure sign they are on their way to becoming mature businesses. I suspect the days when they’d likely get something of a free pass on functional gaps is coming to an end. They now have to figure out how to make the next jump in maintaining the ethos of providing a service that people continue to love. It is not easy. NetSuite went through a terrible time a few years back. Its service was a mess and I was one of those who was highly critical of the company’s approach. Three plus years on and the major issues have been fixed. Last week I met with their people in San Mateo, just outside San Francisco and they have some good stuff in the pipeline around e-commerce.

I also met with BrightPearl in their San Francisco office. BrightPearl are rapidly evolving their business model and with it the functions they deliver. Chief among these is multi-channel marketing. Those with good memories will recall that BrightPearl started out as a a cloud company delivering basic accounting, some CRM and a bit of web shop functionality. Now, they are working feverishly to plug in as many channels as possible for retail and wholesale businesses. That might include Amazon, Google Checkout, PayPal and many others who are emerging in this space – including mobile. Why? Because that’s where modern business is moving. Check out the case study from Lahloo Tea.

But perhaps the most interesting tidbit I picked up while in the Bay Area is that venture capital is very interested in business applications of the kind BrightPearl, Xero, FreeAgent and others provide. Those same VCs see the value that business apps bring and naturally want their piece of the action. That, along with hockey stick growth will drive values up. All good news for the cloud incumbents – yes, I think we can call them that – and customers.

What happens next with these companies will be interesting to watch because with all the growth (and growing pains) we are entering something of an inflection point in the market.

 

Comments on this entry are closed.

Stuart Jones January 30, 2012 at 8:54 am

I never cease to be amazed at how the simplest requests are often ignored by these companies. Despite having dozens of employees (and I’m not singling out Xero), what may only take a day to do and has been requested by many users just doesn’t happen.

Perhaps they shouldn’t forget the simple things in their rush to be innovative. (Spoken as a true Chartered Accountant!)

dahowlett January 30, 2012 at 8:59 am

The problem with what *we* might think of as simple things is rarely simple. For example – the remittance advice I see as a subtle marketing tool. So that then means formatting. How does that happen? Does the user have any control over layout? What about including logos? etc, etc.

Mike Wilson January 30, 2012 at 9:20 am

Hi Denis, I can think of several simple feature requests that I’ve raised with my online book keeping software provider over three years ago which have fairly wide customer support and which continually fall to the wayside.

dahowlett January 30, 2012 at 9:23 am

@mike – for example? IT seems that vendors the world over choose to ignore or put aside those requests they don’t believe will provide huge benefit. They don’t always understand that what they think is right isn’t always the right thing. Sage has had this problem for years and in the long haul it leads to resentment and bitterness. The SaaS/cloud players must not fall into this trap.

Chris Tanner February 3, 2012 at 11:23 pm

Hi Dennis – would love to give you a demo of how our remittance advice works. Fully templated with ability to add custom fields, graphics and so on; for both customer AND supplier remittance.
Chris (Brightpearl)

W. Michael Hsu February 3, 2012 at 10:59 pm

Agreed that many of these innovative software companies are lacking some basic features – the difficult part for them is identifying which of these “basic requests” are truly needed to serve businesses and which ones are simply people wanting new softwares to act the same way old softwares work.

Rod Drury January 31, 2012 at 3:03 am

Good conversation to have.

I don’t think any of the companies would ignore user feedback – I’m sure they are all rigorous in prioritization.  The challenge of building horizontal accounting software is the feature set to compete with incumbents who have been around for 10+ years is massive.  

So prioritization is about balancing strategy, achieving market fit, what you’re touching in each release and a number of other factors. Decisions are made very rationally and all feedback is gold.

There will always be some people who are complaining because their specific need isn’t (yet) met. At Xero we try to manage that by providing a free trial for customers to evaluate fit and not locked into contracts so we have to earn our customers love each month. If we don’t deliver we expect customers will leave.

As soon as we tick off one requested feature a new one comes into focus.  

Also the new vendors are changing what is now standard features.  Would you accept accounting software without daily bank feeds now?

In the future will client side accounting not connected to accountant side features make sense?

All of the vendors are working hard to tick all the boxes but it sill takes time. 

I’m impressed by how fast everyone is going. In a just few short years cloud alternatives are beginning feature match incumbent products with all the benefits of being connected. And these applications are probably the most complex web applications out there.

I can promise you feedback is not ignored.  For all of vendors it’s simply prioritization.   Unlike desktop software we have all actual usage metrics and we also have thousands of customer tickets and requests. For us running the companies it makes us feel ill that we have customers being vocal about a missing feature.  

Hope that is reassuring.

Rod (Xero)

Previous post:

Next post: