<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Tax and Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/category/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.accmanpro.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>HMRC rejects calls for delay to iXBRL</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/09/hmrc-rejects-calls-for-delay-to-ixbrl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/09/hmrc-rejects-calls-for-delay-to-ixbrl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=8622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s confirmed. HMRC will not delay the introduction of iXBRL. In a reply to the professional bodies (PDF download) who lobbied for a delay on this matter, David Gauke, exchequer secretary said: Many software developers have already delivered their products and they and their customers are taking the necessary steps to comply with mandation. While [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/09/hmrc-rejects-calls-for-delay-to-ixbrl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There should be no delay for iXBRL</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/08/there-should-be-no-delay-for-ixbrl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/08/there-should-be-no-delay-for-ixbrl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=8618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simon Hurst thinks the iXBRL debate is centring on the wrong things: The only legitimate reason to appeal for a delay would seem to be that a delay would result in less overall cost and harm to the economy than proceeding with the appointed schedule. Whether it&#8217;s fair that those software houses who have failed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/08/there-should-be-no-delay-for-ixbrl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iXBRL to be delayed?</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/03/ixbrl-to-be-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/03/ixbrl-to-be-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=8602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been scratching my head the last few days. According to AccountingWeb: The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) and the other five main professional tax and accountancy bodies have called on the government to delay its plans for compulsory iXBRL online filing. All six have jointly written to the Exchequer Secretary to ask the government to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/02/03/ixbrl-to-be-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sometimes</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/29/sometimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/29/sometimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=8587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[blackbirdpie url="http://twitter.com/monkchips/status/31343332160446465"] Sometimes a person just nails it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/29/sometimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More bad news for Sage &#8211; no iXBRL for HMRC deadline</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/20/more-bad-news-for-sage-no-ixbrl-for-hmrc-deadline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/20/more-bad-news-for-sage-no-ixbrl-for-hmrc-deadline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=8497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last article I was wondering whether Sage&#8217;s share price slump was about a tepid response to its SageOne solution. It now transpires that Sage will only have a basic XBRL template available for HMRC&#8217;s mandated 1st April. This is a big deal. In AccountancyAge: Sage has delayed the release of its updated iXBRL [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/20/more-bad-news-for-sage-no-ixbrl-for-hmrc-deadline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is UK Uncut wrong?</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/03/is-uk-uncut-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/03/is-uk-uncut-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=8350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just before the Christmas break Mark Lee posted a piece entitled: 8 fallacies that undermine the UK Uncut tax protests.  I thought it was deeply flawed on facts and context. On January 2nd, Richard Murphy posted a robust response entitled: Has UK Uncut got the arguments wrong. I&#8217;m mostly with Richard on this but regardless [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2011/01/03/is-uk-uncut-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuart Jones gets banned in tax protest</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/12/19/stuart-jones-gets-banned-in-tax-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/12/19/stuart-jones-gets-banned-in-tax-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=8333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stuart Jones, senior partner 3CA, chartered accountants based in Kendal is a long time reader of AccMan. He&#8217;s a really nice person who works hard to do the best he can for his clients. He gets rightfully annoyed at the antics of bureaucracies that harm, impede or otherwise behave badly towards the small business. He&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/12/19/stuart-jones-gets-banned-in-tax-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The curious amici curiae brief on behalf of PwC</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/09/11/the-curious-amici-curiae-brief-on-behalf-of-pwc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/09/11/the-curious-amici-curiae-brief-on-behalf-of-pwc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amicus curiae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francine McKenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generally Accepted Accounting Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Revenue and Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PricewaterhouseCoopers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=7599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not a lawyer though I&#8217;ve done my share of arguing in front of HM Revenue and Customs General Commissioners and briefing counsel on litigious matters. It can be tough yet rewarding work. Over the weekend Francine McKenna sent me the amicus brief submitted on behalf of AICPA and NYSSCPA in the case of Teachers&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/09/11/the-curious-amici-curiae-brief-on-behalf-of-pwc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change our mode of thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/07/26/change-our-mode-of-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/07/26/change-our-mode-of-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Harvey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoover Institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-executive director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Sowell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=7298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems there&#8217;s a theme running here at the moment. Change. Whatever that might mean. The above video which features prof David Harvey, a radical sociologist, is something I came across as a result of sifting through some of Richard Murphy&#8217;s recent posts. As he says &#8211; this is taking a Marxian approach &#8211; anathema [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/07/26/change-our-mode-of-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vantis in administration, 52 more firms at risk</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/07/01/vantis-in-administration-52-more-firms-at-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/07/01/vantis-in-administration-52-more-firms-at-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax and Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vantis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.com/?p=7229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The writing has been on the wall for some time. It now seems that Vantis&#8217; weight of debt has killed off the one time darling of the accounting firm aggregator market. Richard Murphy says: &#8216;I told you so.&#8217; While I don&#8217;t fully agree with his reasoning, which he links to greed, the entitlement attitudes that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accmanpro.com/2010/07/01/vantis-in-administration-52-more-firms-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

